Your manuscript is already in great shape but please go through our guidelines below that specify the correct formatting of your final resubmission to avoid delays towards formal acceptance. Its been more than 2 months since I submitted my manuscript to a journal. Figures for recent years (original research only) are shown in the table below: Nature does not employ an editorial board of senior scientists, nor is it affiliated to a scientific society or institution, thus its decisions are independent, unbiased by scientific or national prejudices of particular individuals. No, Modified on: Fri, 10 Sep, 2021 at 3:16 PM. Scott, Michael - Ancient Worlds_ A Global History of Antiquity | PDF paper acceptance probability in case of long peer review time for the 1st decision. Reviewers will assess the technical soundness and scientific validity of your methods, analysis and interpretation, all of which must be appropriate, properly conducted, ethically robust and fully supported by the data. This website is using a security service to protect itself from online attacks. Sometimes they are more busy. What does "Editor Decision Started" mean? : r/labrats - reddit Most professional editors have eyes on the page from four to six hours a day; any more tends to dull the focus needed to spot issues. I submitted a manuscript to a Nature journal six days ago. Editors will not send resubmitted papers to the reviewers if it seems that the authors have not made a serious attempt to address all the referees criticisms. Status has been "Ready for decision" for 25 days. The difference between the phonemes /p/ and /b/ in Japanese, How to handle a hobby that makes income in US. Manuscript Status Tables Part 2 - Notes from the JGR-Space Physics The first step in making the right decision is recognizing the problem or opportunity and deciding to address it. Decisions are quicker, and editorial criteria can be made uniform across disciplines. In cases where authors opt in to publication of peer reviewer comments and reviewers opt in to being named, we will not link a reviewers name to their report unless they choose to sign their comments to the author with their name. EDIT: As Strongbad points out in a comment the term Awaiting Editors Decision strictly indicates that the paper has passed reviewers. Editorial process : Springer Support One perk, however, is having the choice and control over what I . I have experience with the manuscript submission process, from submission to peer review, to acceptance/rejection. Thank you for visiting nature.com. To complicate matters further, editors must base their decisions on evidence that is never completely reliable. ]]> //-->editor decision started nature Is it fair to reject manuscript with few words of comments after long 9 months of review? Although we hope that the peer review files will provide a detailed and useful view into our peer review process, it is important to note that these files will not contain all the information considered in the editorial decision making process, such as the discussions between editors, editorial decision letters, or any confidential comments made by reviewers or authors to the editors. Did this satellite streak past the Hubble Space Telescope so close that it was out of focus? If the authors feel that they have a strong scientific case for reconsideration (if the referees have missed the point of the paper, for example) they can appeal the decision in writing. Based on the Nature Review Speed Feedback System, it takes editor 118.0 days to accept manuscript. The editor considers reviewer feedback and their own evaluation of the manuscript in order to reach a decision. This is also the time for the "desk review by the editor," though, and so it probably took 2 weeks for the editor to decide to decline it. the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in [CDATA[> We would suggest that you wait for another 2 weeks before writing to the journal for an update. The handbookis available from R Upskill, a sister brand providing learning programs for various aspects of a researchers work, including writing, submission, publication, and research promotion. Calm down, and wait a few days before starting your response, then re-read the version of the paper that you actually submitted. on 07 Apr, 2021, This content belongs to the Journal submission & peer review Stage. Decision pending means that the decision is pending.They havent decided yet. The SEC pay-to-play rule for investment advisers as it turns 12 Can we write a courteous mail asking about the status change from 'Decision Made' to 'Under Consideration'? How long and formal should a paper revision letter to the editor be? Until then, you may find it worthwhile to go through the following resources about journal statuses: Answered by Irfan Syed Nature (Nature) Is it possible to rotate a window 90 degrees if it has the same length and width? March 1, 2023 - As we approach, on March 14, its 12-year anniversary, now is as good a time as any to reflect on Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") Rule 206 (4)-5 (the "Pay-to-Play Rule . Most respectable journals have a definite map designed since submission, first editoroial decision, review time, last editorial decision, Editing and publication. Our original resources for authors and journals will help you become an expert in academic publishing. The criteria for a paper to be sent for peer-review are that the results seem novel, arresting (illuminating, unexpected or surprising), and that the work described has both immediate and far-reaching implications. At some point, they may come back to you and ask you to suggest names (additional names, if you had already given some when you originally submitted the paper). Thanks! Such quick changes may mean a glitch, but given that its a Nature journal, thats unlikely. If Nature declines to publish a paper and does not suggest resubmission, authors are strongly advised to submit their paper for publication elsewhere. answered Jul 2, 2014 at 10:14. Currently working as an Assistant Editor for the Discover Journals under Springer Nature. good luck!! Internet Explorer). [CDATA[> Editorial criteria and processes | Nature n - The content of the press release mailing and papers described therein is embargoed until 1600 London time/1100 US Eastern Time on the day of publication, which is the time at which the research is published and become publicly available. To borrow a phrase that Bertolt Brecht originally wrote about science itself, the chief aim of our appeals process is not to open a door to infinite wisdom, but to set a limit to infinite error., Decisions, decisions. If you receive a revise and resubmit it may take another 24 months to hear back on the revised article. This decision will then be validated by the Editor-in-Chief. Did you find it helpful? AE stands for Associate Editor. If authors wish to contest an editorial decision, we ask them to submit a form that organizes their arguments into categories that we find useful in reviewing our original judgments. Yes Answer (1 of 4): Hi! Decisions by editors are routinely made very rapidly after receipt of reports, and Nature offers an advance online publication (AOP) service to an increasing number of manuscripts. //--> The titles of forthcoming papers will be listed on the mailing, along with the corresponding authors' contact details, which means authors may receive media enquiries relating to their paper during this embargo period. Please share with the community how many days the entire process took by the editor's office. Prophecies Fulfilled: The Qur'anic Arabs in the Early 600s The Academic Editor being consulted will be asked to provide an advisory recommendation on the manuscript and may recommend acceptance, further peer-review, or uphold the original rejection decision. you're still in the running. Authors subsequently receive an e-proof, including the figures, and can also download a PDF proof of the layout. Register for comprehensive research tips and expert advice on English writing, journal publishing, good publication practices, trends in publishing, and a lot more. The manuscript subject falls outside of the Aims and Scope of the selected journal or is not likely to be of interest to the readership of the selected journal. Sovereignty - Wikipedia In light of such uncertainty, the threshold for reversing a decision must be set well above the level of 'noise' in the process: otherwise, decisions would simply go back and forth endlessly in a kind of Brownian motion. What does the distribution of wait times for a editor decision look like for a manuscript submitted to Science or Nature? Proofs are cycled between Natures production staff, our typesetter and the author by means of an online production-tracking system. The paper is rejected with no offer to reconsider a resubmitted version. Manuscript submitted exactly 2 months ago. It could mean just about anything. Ellie Bergstrom, PhD on Twitter @Fomite so you still said gamma with just 1 parameter What is the other? Reviews for "Nature Communications" - Page 1 - SciRev Answer: The status Decision in process after Under review means that all the reviews have come in and the editor is evaluating your paper based on the reviewers comments. What the . Plos One So, it probably means that the associate editor (AE), who handles the manuscript through the review and publication process, had a look at your manuscript and made a decision on it, most probably for rejection. What does editor decision started mean nature? Stage 2: Editor assigned. [CDATA[// >